I was motivated once again to PRINT in an article based on a comment from a reader, as well as I always say, your comments help me feed back and encourage debate, that's the idea of \u200b\u200bmy space.
comment text:
And who is trying to shut up?
that as it sounds paranoid ...
Al setback would like to talk more. Specifically I would like to answer the following questions, which apparently you never do:
Why after almost 5 decades of Fidel revolution must be the "promoter" of the energy revolution?
Is not that it occurred to anyone else before or is that Fidel is to give him credit for all the "big ideas"?
That is exactly "what we have gained so far?
What is "our process"?
If these "decisions" to "study" and "analyze" and even consult with Fidel end up being wrong, Who is responsible for them?
Empire?
Who decides when a "measure" made a mistake?
All "setbacks" have to make them "won" or only some?
began dating in the "Stage aggressive consumer capitalism that humanity now lives?
is that capitalism was once one of these two things?
How do you decide what is "in pursuit of human development" and what is not?
At least in the "corrupt system" known to be problems to be solved because people do not have to "give permission" to complain.
My Answer:
First of all, I have a confession to make I'm not a political scholar, I am not a scholar of literature, I am not a future journalist, I am a 22 year old computer student, not UCI, and above all no one sends me to write these lines. Just having the opportunity to go into the cyberworld, I discovered the cruel way in which discredits the revolutionary process, not only in Cuba but the rest of the progressive countries emerging on our planet.
also explained that no one is trying to keep quiet and not paranoia, the title of my blog, is dedicated partner King of Spain to try to censor the voice of the third world to have such a grotesque gesture against the Bolivarian President Hugo Rafael Chavez Frias, the incident made me convinced of the need for more space (from the perspective of an ordinary human being with no commitment to any movement, rather than truth) to make him the face of adversity "enemy." I see you raise many questions, the word "enemy" gives participation of any institution, person or system of government that tries to break the revolutionary movements that pose as human improvement hypothesis (equality, brotherhood, end poverty, end of violence and so on. etc ...).
Now try to expand on my ideas giving answers to your questions, including some time ago I took the liberty to do. But I recommend that you read a bit more in the Blog, here in one way or another I answer your questions.
First of all, I will clarify something for Cubans Fidel word rather than a person stands for a concept, Fidel is the faithful and devoted, protagonist of the revolution.
You say: Why after almost 5 decades of Fidel revolution must be the "promoter" of the energy revolution?
I'm not well versed in energy matters but I think, more or less the reasons come down this road. The revolution from its inception sought to bring electrical energy to all corners of the country as part of its social development plan. Just as it was a problem, considering that we were severely blocked and our bank had been looted by the American clique present in our country before the triumph of the Revolution, as well as top talent who had the country had left our borders, counting addition to the desperate and ferocious economic blockade that were submitted by the largest economy in the world, just 90 miles away, without having extraterritorial measures applied by the U.S. empire. However, this situation gave the revolution efforts to develop talents, and accepted the assistance of the Soviet camp, which led us to develop the technology in some areas as power generation was also helped by selling oil, with payment preferences. Thus the years passed and the country was under way, but as one knows the URS lost the ideological battle against USA, which does not dedicate myself to explain, and our country was a moment to another without their leading trading partner, which led the arrival of the "Special Period." Faced with this situation at any moment we were stocked out, we cut the oil supply the smear campaign was also the rule that all countries give us back a few exceptions, we entered a deep economic crisis. It was illogical to think that time on how to produce energy as an alternative, first because we had to prioritize which not a single child fail to attend school, not one person left to receive free medical care, and second because we had neither the capital and credit needed to undertake reforms in our electricity generation system. Little by little when it was suitable as it would strengthen the national economy and to breakage of our plants are welcomed to the system reform designed by our scientists and supported 100% by our Commander, was the time and the right time. So I mean, after nearly 50 years Fidel did not have to be the "promoter" was the situation when those who led.
You say: Is not that it occurred to anyone before or is that Fidel is to give him credit for all the "big ideas"?
Well maybe now you know that, but like I said the idea emerged when the bases were given, before it was not feasible. The comment you credit as it takes the concept Fidel, not man.
You say: That is exactly what until now we have won? Well
I just started to talk a little about the causes and conditions that affected our country in the true economic crisis. Well, maybe what you expect as an answer is, we won in cars, food, consumer goods .... This would be what it would behoove someone to answer your thinking consumer, but it's not what I should communicate to me, and not because it is a state policy to deprive citizens of consumer goods, but because the economic war that we tax has been deprived of them, however to this, here's my answer: Our life expectancy to rise to levels higher than that of developed nations, like our children and our mortality rates education, eradicate illiteracy, social exclusion, unemployment, achieve universal higher education, major scientific achievements in various fields such as biotechnology have been accomplished, eliminate racism, we managed to get our economic future, which is currently in promotion process, after the terrible economic crisis and under the established world order, we have that there is a child doing somersaults in the street to get to eat, do you think is enough, it expects to see more.
You say: What is "our process"?
First in "our process" People obviously did not contemplate selfish, self-centered, murderous, deceitful and corrupt. In our process
contemplate caring people, maybe with some margin of selfishness and corruption direct result of war wounds left by the war against the country, but essentially faithful people and complete the revolutionary process, people who sacrifice their ideas A Fistful of Dollars by becoming mercenaries of the empire.
Having said that, commented that "our process" (do not know if you're in) is to preserve "what we have accomplished," is to achieve increasing standards of living of the population, without neglecting the spirit of solidarity and internationalism of the country, preserving social interests over individual ones, receive remuneration commensurate with our job performance, absolute peace, welfare, healthy recreation away from drugs, vice and gambling. Eliminate corruption, and many more goals ... That is what our process.
You say: If these "decisions" to "study" and "analyze" and even consult with Fidel end up being wrong, who is responsible for them? The rule?
As has always happened to be liable the same study it, analyze and even Fidel himself is responsible, as has often occurred, have admitted mistakes in the revolutionary process, no absolutely no one is alien to make mistakes, the errors are taken lessons for subsequent decisions, the mistakes of the revolution, the best solutions are born. When you touch the empire the blame because you have to load in your arsenal of wrongdoing, while being on domestic issues, will be our responsibility.
You say: Who decides when a "measure" made a mistake?
History, and the same people.
You say: To all the "setbacks" have to make them "won" or only some?
All must be converted into victories, is the only way forward, every setback is a wound that must heal, when heal the highest defense is preventing a reversal of the same type or variation of this, do not think this immunization, and is a victory?
You say: What date did this "aggressive and consumer stage of capitalism that humanity now lives? Is that capitalism was once one of these two things?
Well as you say capitalism has always been two things, but as you know has a cyclical development, and end of each cycle is a crisis, oil crisis currently tied the unsustainable international financial system have increased levels aggression and consumption, what I mean.
You say: How do you decide what is "in pursuit of human development "and what is not?
That's up to the very life that a child dies of hunger or not, a man dying in the prime of his youth, it is not, that promote illegal wars, not, to discriminate against a person by their color or sex, it is not, to prioritize individual enrichment slopes of social distress and poverty of millions of people is not all that detrimental to the dignity human, it is not, the reverse of the coin in the view of life is a path towards human development.
You say: At least in the "corrupt system" known to be problems to be solved because people should not "give permission" to complain.
Everyone knows that problems to be solved in the "corrupt system", indeed, but far from resolved, accrue as a direct result of their development policies. Moreover
my people we must not give permission to complain, or did he not take up arms when necessary to overthrow Batista, who want to tear down the building of socialism, only alternative to remove existing problems, it is clear we will not, we do not want or even managed to convince us making us starve.
So here I hope I have not bored the reader, we often long ideas, very deep, assuming that what is written is blablabla, because when it is praise, and truths we are reluctant to continue, yet we love to read gossip, and discouraging news of wars, hunger and misery. I think that we have been taught from birth.
If at any time I incurred in a historical or conceptual error, please I beg someone more eloquent on the subject let me know to avoid (as it did our commander) to make concessions to the enemy. Greetings and hope
comments.
0 comments:
Post a Comment