John Cena In Joe Boxers

"Athens or Jerusalem?


Articles Meta
By Eduardo Hernando Nieto


One of the most well-known thesis of Professor Leo Strauss is undoubtedly the recognition of the greatness of the West has achieved thanks to the tension between Athens and Jerusalem, namely, that our Western culture is not have been feasible without the support of reason and faith. This is because in both cases two different manifestations of wisdom, wisdom for the Bible begins with the fear of God while for this philosophy begins in wonder. If someone wants to search for wisdom - as is the case of Strauss - then you have to put on the table the two perspectives and hear what they have to house that one of them to choose, however, such an act would already taking sides in favor of philosophy.

is certainly possible to find multiple matches between the two, in fact, theology and classical philosophy oppose many of the most important features of modernity, anthropocentrism, the turn toward the moral rights rather than obligations ( as suggested by contemporary liberal approaches) or the dependence of man toward history (historicism) likewise, both call for moral recovery. In this sense, both Athens and Jerusalem are the great enemies of nihilism and materialism that threatens the world today.

Nevertheless, these are two ways to define what would be the most correct way of life, which is always the question those who bet on the life of wisdom. This is essentially the so called political theological problem: "The political theological problem, as Strauss articulates it in concrete, through a fundamental question, namely whether the man can come to the knowledge of good in order to guide individual or collective life with their own natural powers effort or whether this is dependent on divine revelation. "

It's true - as noted by Strauss - the Biblical tradition, is based in the presence of a mysterious God whose presence are felt but not visible, and only know about it when it does knowledge through his word (for example, with phrases like "I am who I am.") Strauss says about it:
"In almost all respects, the word of God as revealed to their prophets and Moses especially, become the source of knowledge of good and evil, the true tree of knowledge, is at the same time the tree of life "

However, if for example the Platonic God, it does not create the world with their words but through the contemplation of eternal ideas which are above it, in this sense, theology would obviously not room for the doctrine of ideas.

However, we must not overlook that in practice philosophy can not refute faith faith nor philosophy can refute, so you would have to come to a conclusion that calls into question the assertion earlier about the dominance of philosophy over theology, and this for the simple reason that if you can not refute the theology then the choice of philosophy would eventually be a matter of faith.

The Western world has apparently tried to integrate or synthesize faith and reason, but what has emerged as Strauss says it is not integration but an attempt at integration, however, will have to conclude that this harmonization effort is doomed to failure because each places a thing as unique and necessary, namely, the Bible, take obedient love life and philosophy of life will self-understanding.

But while we have seen both are necessary for the development of the Western world, the advent of modernity could be said to have begun at the time of being sought to overcome stress. It is interesting to note if the way in the so-called Medieval Rationalism (Maimonides, Averroes etc) was achieved relationship of equal respect to each of those traditions, through the distinction between esoteric and exoteric, and therefore at the esoteric philosophical understanding that life was the life of the pursuit of knowledge standing here in a plane superiority over the life of obedience. However, in the exoteric level, the medieval rationalists were subordinate to the law. This was then managed intelligently as the tension in this period. However, Strauss suggests the possibility that it was through Thomism, when in an attempt to harmonize and integrate them, there was the subordination of philosophy to revelation , Which opens the way to another subordinate even more problematic, is now dependent on the revelation of philosophy, this would begin with Machiavelli, and would be the starting point of modernity and development from Positivism to Historicism, and from the historicism to Nihilism.

no doubt that the greatness of our Western culture depends on the recovery of these two great traditions and the restoration of his power, a difficult task at present exhibiting rather a depletion of reason and faith.

Rims 95 Chevy Silverado

What is the Conservative Revolution?


Metapolítica

articles

Given the gross distortion of the national revolutionary thinking and meta, developed out of malice and ignorance Faverón Patriau Gustavo and his "followers", I'll try to explain succinctly what this thought, but not to seek convince anyone of its advantages but to prevent uninformed many people fall into generalizations and trivialized Faverón made in a number of messages in your personal blog, all designed to further discredit.

would say in principle that it is a term coined by Professor Armin Mohler, [1] - Ernst writer's personal secretary Jünger for several years - to refer to an important manifestation of German thought the inter-war period and included a number of personalities from various scientific disciplines, from economics to literature and from sociology to theology. Authors such as Jünger, Sombart, Spengler, Niekisch, Moeller van der Bruck, even to the same mystical poet Stefan George, - nothing of the spiritual master Stauffenberg brothers [2] - was also included in this group.

Thus, under this category joined a group of personalities that often ended pursued by National Socialism (as Niekisch case was finally protected by the Jünger brothers) or shot as in the case of Claus von Stauffenberg. Then say that the Conservative Revolution was Fascist or Nazi is simply to assert that nothing is known about this topic.

But what these authors had in common classified by those who never have read them as fascists or Nazis to dry? First, they were undoubtedly a product of German romantic thought of the nineteenth century, speech highly critical of French rationalism and universalism thesis, against this, claiming the difference and collective identity (which tell Gonzalo Gamio to see here genesis of his beloved communitarianism Taylorist). Also, they felt very close to what we would call a purposeful life as the heroic life against a life emptied of content that content to produce comfort and entertainment (bourgeois life).

will surprise many to know for example that the harmless ones "Boy Scouts of Baden Powell had their origin in the movements of" Wandervogels "youth associations aspiring to a more natural and in harmony with nature that emerged within the Conservative Revolution.

In short, the movement appeared as a response to the "Civilization" bourgeois, proposing the replacement the "Kultur", a claim of natural life against artificial life. Direct contact with original sources of the self (spirituality) against atheistic materialism.


finally is a complex issue but that can not be made to Wikipedia or some evil-minded melodrama. Indeed, the academic work of which is to be straight and show them in their true dimension. We gain nothing by labeling free without having read such a line of a landmark effort to the "Konservative Revolution" as • The worker Ernst Jünger. (Continued)

[1] Die Konservative Revolution in Deutschland from 1918 to 1932. Ein Handbuch. With this work Mohler earned his Ph.D. at the University of Basel, advised by Professors Herman Schmalenbach and Karl Jaspers. He was also director of the Friedrich Siemmens and Konrad Adenauer Prize (1967), was also Professor of Political Science at the University of Innsbruck.
[2] Claus is precisely the one who placed the bomb meant to kill Hitler.

Yellow Eyes How To Cure Jaundice

Evola: A Defense


Metapolítica

articles

By Eduardo Hernando Nieto


ignorance and arrogance never have limits, not surprising that all the barrage of lies and insults that came pouring Mr. Gustavo Faverón (http://puenteareo1.blogspot.com/) - which serves as a literary critic and teacher - now become by magic in the great specialist in the work of Julius Evola metapolitical teacher.

His elementary logic is built something like this: Julius Evola was a fascist and Nazi anti-Semitic, Professor Eduardo Hernando Nieto, is an admirer of Evola, therefore, Professor Eduardo Hernando Nieto is a fascist , anti-Semitic and Nazi. (And the obvious question is what does Eduardo Hernando Nieto appointed professor at the Pontifical University Catolica del Peru, "that is what makes teaching in the PUCP Nazi? )

The response could include:

Julius Evola, was neither Nazi nor anti-Semitic or fascist. Eduardo Hernando Nieto
if you are a fan of the work of Julius Evola. Mr. Faverón

quoted as several commentators have noted references unclear on an introduction to the text "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion", but does not refer to any of his major books - from meta - Evola as "Men and the Ruins "," Riding the Tiger "," Revolt Against the Modern World "or" Cinabro Road "(autobiography). Even

Faverón have no idea that there is a monumental work that explains in detail the thinking evoliano, developed by Dr. Christophe Boutin, Professor at the University of Caen in France, who just received his Ph.D. in Political Science with a thesis on thought of Julius Evola, who was later published under the title: "Politique et Tradition Julius Evola dans le Siècle (1998 - 1974)" and none other than the prestigious editorial Kime. (Kime, Paris IV, 1992). As Mr Faverón lives in the United States is likely to have access to this book essential to rule out all these such basic thesis and poisonous about this man who was identified by Marguerite Yourcenar (another great fascist likely to Faverón) as "Scholar and Genius" ("Des Recettes du mieux pour un art - vivre", Le Monde, 21 July 1972 ), which was not only one of the first representatives of Dadaism, but excelled in the spread of seemingly distant issues such as hiking, medieval legends, Tantra, Buddhism, the esoteric, etc.

Evola The claims raised against this man who has not read it - relatively speaking, of course - I do remember the basic criticism made against a teacher Leo Strauss Drury named Canadian accused him of masterminding the American neoconservatism. Although this case will have to say that at least this teacher read to Strauss (but not understood or manipulated her ideas) and it has now been exposed by many eminent scholars as husbands Zuckert, Steven Smith, and Thomas Pangle. (Teachers in Universities as well known as Notre Dame, Yale and Texas)

obviously Faverón has no relevance in the academic world so you never need to write some work to dismantle its sham, however, it must be affirmed, at least by this means the gross distortions that made this man, against a man who only attempted to show how modern societies undergo a solidification process and lack of meaning and purpose just to have lost contact with a spiritual center, that's would eventually meta essence, therefore, the issue of race or religion can go into the background. To paraphrase an author who could also appear as metapolitical DH Lawrence: In the peaks all the flowers are confused. Therefore, for us men of tradition, not interested in being Muslim, Catholic or Jewish, meanwhile, are pious men who aspire to a return.